@Quinnypig @Euph0r14 @miki @GossiTheDog It might be possible to have a separate sandbox per customer. But. They won’t have a separate one per slack channel (too expensive). So. The assumption becomes broken that private channels (like HR), or that DMs will remain unavailable to all employees. Because LLMs leak their training data.

@toadjaune @miki @GossiTheDog @Quinnypig it is an open research question.

The only thing I know which achieves actual privacy guarantees is differential privacy, and that makes LLMs commercially unusable.

@mutax @GossiTheDog @Quinnypig People never opt in to anything. You could tell most people that they can get a million dollars, no strings attached, and they'd just click whatever button strikes their fancy to close that popup as quickly as possible without even reading what it says. If it's an opt-in in the settings? Forget it.

@GossiTheDog @miki @Quinnypig I think because it sounded like they were going to train AI on sensitive, confidential data and then provide public access to that AI, which could leak secrets and whatnot between companies, whereas it sounds like it's specific to the company. Which... is still a nightmare, now secrets from management can leak down to other employees potentially.

@GossiTheDog see https://www.threads.net/@aaronjmaurer/post/C7C2-NPuL61. Slack is not training LLMs on messages or any other customer data. There are other kinds of ML models doing things like recommendations as described in https://slack.engineering/recommend-api/