Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
pixelfed's posts Post Back to profile
Top-level
Hirad

@2d @pixelfed
Except in 2nd post they speak about catching repeat offenders. If it's just "self-labeling", then what is there to catch exactly? What is the offense?

13 May at 16:08 | Wall-to-wall | Open on m.hirad.it
8 comments
VOLTΛIRE

@hirad @pixelfed then that would be people who post AI content and label it as not ai

13 May at 16:09 | Open on chaosfem.tw
Hirad

@2d @pixelfed and how is that gonna be done? The AI content must be detected somehow to be able to judge if a post should have been labeled or not.

13 May at 16:12 | Open on m.hirad.it
VOLTΛIRE

@hirad @pixelfed usually people just look at it

13 May at 16:26 | Open on chaosfem.tw
Hirad
VOLTΛIRE

@hirad @pixelfed do you think an algorithm would be more effective than a human moderator?

13 May at 17:41 | Open on chaosfem.tw
Hirad

@2d @pixelfed
I don't even think admin is entitled to decide about that. As long as an image is not illegal, insulting or inappropriate (you know, the regular rules instances have), it shouldn't matter if it's a picture taken by a camera, painted, drawn, generated by AI or produced in any other way.
Generating AI image is not an "offense" to be caught and moderated beyond standard moderation rules.

13 May at 18:04 | Open on m.hirad.it
VOLTΛIRE

@hirad @pixelfed oh but it completely could be under this system - lying about your image not being ai generated could be very frustrating on, for example, an art or photography focused instance.
I’m not as hardline anti AI as many on mastodon, but there are reasons why people might not want to see ai content, and if people break rules to get around that, it can be a moderated action.

13 May at 18:09 | Open on chaosfem.tw
Hirad replied to VOLTΛIRE

@2d @pixelfed
That's a good point. I hadn't considered those instances.
Will see how exactly it's gonna be implemented, but I think I agree with you now that it can be beneficial.

13 May at 18:26 | Open on m.hirad.it
Go Up