Gregory's Server@jwildeboer
But even if you had a strong standard.
Isnt the point that https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main still collaborates with W3C?
Hope it stays independent enough and will be able to protect against these kinds of attacks 🙂
|
Top-level
 3 comments
 @serapath @jwildeboer FEP process doesn't prevent people from extending the protocol, in fact it has the opposite goal. But it protects Fediverse by decentralizing standards development. It doesn't dictate what is a standard and what is not, instead developers decide for themselves which FEPs they want to implement, and eventually some FEPs may become de-facto standards @silverpill @jwildeboer i am mich in favor of everything becoming a de-facto standard. if works and we dont need anything else. |
@serapath @jwildeboer
Yes, as co-facilitator of #FEP, that is the point. Highly in favor of a bottom-up 3-phase standards process designed to guarantee an open ecosystem and tech landscape. Wrote a bunch about that on #SocialHub:
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/3-stage-standards-process-guaranteeing-an-open-and-decentralized-ecosystem/3602
Yet it is hard.. as it happens and in typical grassroots social dynamics, everyone tends to care most about their own shop.
Much to the benefit of any large corporation practicing EE or #EEE, I should add. Meta is already king.
@serapath @jwildeboer
Yes, as co-facilitator of #FEP, that is the point. Highly in favor of a bottom-up 3-phase standards process designed to guarantee an open ecosystem and tech landscape. Wrote a bunch about that on #SocialHub:
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/3-stage-standards-process-guaranteeing-an-open-and-decentralized-ecosystem/3602