everyone i have figured it out, cats just have unchecked...

jonny (good kind)

everyone i have figured it out, cats just have unchecked integer operations

Like 26 April at 8:30 | Open on neuromatch.social

Androcat

Sensitive content

@jonny That makes perfect sense.

26 April at 8:32 | Open on toot.cat

jonny (good kind)

breeding a cat that works on unsigned integers

26 April at 8:35 | Open on neuromatch.social

gaytabase

@jonny look start with booleans. cats always say no, but i'm unclear they understand what yes means.

26 April at 8:36 | Open on social.treehouse.systems

jonny (good kind)

@dysfun
If I ever make a programming language bools will be true only, in your honor

26 April at 8:39 | Open on neuromatch.social

gaytabase

@jonny funny thing, but a number of people in the theorem prover community think we should stop using bools and replace them with proofs and contradictions

26 April at 8:40 | Open on social.treehouse.systems

f.rift :fire_blue:

@dysfun @jonny makes sense; nothing in math is true or false, only consistent or inconsistent.

26 April at 9:13 | Open on hackers.town

f.rift :fire_blue:

@dysfun @jonny (or underspecified for the determination of its consistency. or, uh, some worse things that can occur in special cases...)

26 April at 9:14 | Open on hackers.town

gaytabase

@feonixrift @jonny we tend to think of it as booleans erasing what they pertain to :)

26 April at 9:14 | Open on social.treehouse.systems

f.rift :fire_blue:

@dysfun @jonny :blobsweats: I don't think I have time to esolang rabbithole today.

26 April at 9:19 | Open on hackers.town

gaytabase replied to f.rift

@feonixrift @jonny it's not esoteric, it's just type theoretic

26 April at 9:20 | Open on social.treehouse.systems

Piiieps & Brummm

@jonny
I wonder, if this heppens less with double cats. 🤔

26 April at 12:05 | Open on chaos.social

jonny (good kind)

@owl
Can happen anywhere on the positive domain I think

26 April at 20:41 | Open on neuromatch.social

scmbradley

@jonny adding a check for overflows would affect purrrrformance.

26 April at 8:57 | Open on mathstodon.xyz

joriki

@jonny

something something DIGITal division

26 April at 10:22 | Open on infosec.exchange

DELETED

@efi @jonny I'm quite sure those are love bites

26 April at 11:57 | Open on mastodon.de

DELETED

@efi so no overflow you know
it's kind of like spikes of neurons
too much pleasure stored = 1 bite

26 April at 12:00 | Open on mastodon.de

Efi (nap pet) 🦊💤

@iacore no, you're just wrong and misunderstanding the science of catgirls

26 April at 12:04 | Open on chitter.xyz

DELETED

@efi awawawawa (sensei please teach me catgirl science)

26 April at 12:06 | Open on mastodon.de

Efi (nap pet) 🦊💤

@iacore not in a good brain space today, but some other time, sure

26 April at 12:07 | Open on chitter.xyz

jonny (good kind)

@efi
Integer underflow CVE ( catgirl vulnerability and disclosure )

26 April at 20:43 | Open on neuromatch.social

Guy on the run

@jonny
Thanks Doc. Now I finally understand what the hell is going on.

26 April at 13:16 | Open on mastodon.social

Isaac Ji Kuo

@jonny

Nuclear Gandhi wasn't an integer underflow bug, Nuclear Gandhi was a cat.

26 April at 18:59 | Open on spacey.space

Ángel

So they are interally controlled by a sawtooth wave LFO

26 April at 20:49 | Open on triptico.com

blinken

@jonny I must have the 32-bit model

26 April at 21:52 | Open on hachyderm.io

ralph_himself

@jonny my OCD is kicking hard: the chart should only go to +127, not +128.

26 April at 22:14 | Open on kinky.business

jonny (good kind)

@ralph_himself
Just interpret those as axis limits but the lines dont quite get all the way to the top and bottom

26 April at 23:08 | Open on neuromatch.social

Thinks Deer Are Cool

@jonny ...okay but in my experience this is close to literally true, they bite when they start getting sensory/emotional overload

27 April at 5:28 | Open on weirder.earth