@tennoseremel @delProfundo @LianaBrooks @jsrailton
And my point is: That means that people sufficiently competent with cryptography can never be found guilty in white-collar crime ?
ENRON: "Sorry, lost the password" - Not guilty!
Really ?
Top-level
Poul-Henning Kamp
@tennoseremel @delProfundo @LianaBrooks @jsrailton And my point is: That means that people sufficiently competent with cryptography can never be found guilty in white-collar crime ? ENRON: "Sorry, lost the password" - Not guilty! Really ? 3 comments
dexternemrod :qubes: replied to Ténno
@bsdphk @delProfundo @LianaBrooks @jsrailton This! And in addition you would danger all other people.
Didier
@bsdphk @tennoseremel @delProfundo @LianaBrooks @jsrailton It can be solved with a few cameras in every house, you know? It's not that you have something to hide and it could prevent some child abuse. Extra benefit: you can have your e2ee in your chat, for now. |
@bsdphk If a few bits on a device you, as a police officer, do not control is your only evidence, then yes, you are out if luck. Work better.
@delProfundo @LianaBrooks @jsrailton