Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
LibreOffice

Question! Why should local governments use taxpayers’ money to buy proprietary, closed software from a single vendor? And what happens to citizens' data? A solution is to move to free and open source software like #Linux and #LibreOffice – which is exactly what Schleswig-Holstein is doing: blog.documentfoundation.org/bl #foss #OpenSource #privacy

State logo
16 comments
翠星石
@libreoffice >free and open source software like #Linux
Unfortunately, the kernel, Linux is proprietary software.

If you want a free version of Linux, I recommend; https://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
alexadeswift

@libreoffice done correctly, the TCO should be lower, and that should be better value for taxpayers.

Paul Wunderlich

@libreoffice Effectively one can not "buy" proprietary software.

in_sympathy

@libreoffice guys is there any way of collaborating in real time in LibreOffice like with iWork apps over iCloud or with Microsoft 365?

silbaer

@in_sympathy @libreoffice Probably not. But I don't think that is a use case here. And you are probably looking for Nextcloud office...

Jonas

@in_sympathy @libreoffice there is Collabora and Nextcloud office, but i do not know if they also work with local clients

LibreOffice

@catavz A long, long time ago – a lot has changed since then. And many would argue that it didn't succeed for political reasons, rather than technical: itsfoss.com/munich-linux-failu

Tavo

@libreoffice @catavz political reasons and personal benefits of some people was the worse.

DELETED

@libreoffice why libreoffice sux vs office of M$.
Fact.

:gnu:Hacker

@libreoffice To #Linux or to #GNU? Linux is a kernel, not an operating system. There are not many other OSes with a Linux kernel. GNU, Android and Musl distributions are the most common if not the only ones. The rest are derivations of them. For example µClibc is a GNU implementation.

:gnu:Hacker

@libreoffice I would expect from them a donation to the Document Foundation.

mid_kid

@Fedihacker If you're gonna call µClibc a GNU implementation then musl is one as well, tbh. (and I'd agree)

Go Up