Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Jargoggles

@coldfish @aral @Gargron
The fact that Threads is set up as a monolithic instance that prevents anyone from blocking it in piecemeal is a Threads problem, not a fedi server admin problem (the same is true of Bluesky).

Like you said, Threads can't be trusted to properly moderate its content and the tool that server admins have for that is defederation. Making individual users have to handle a deluge of toxic content themselves has *never* been seriously considered as an appropriate response by any instance that cares about its users.

The fact that Threads is so massive isn't a reason for federating with them, it's the reason why it's even more absurd to act like this is a problem that individual users need to deal with.

If we defederate from toxic instances that have hundreds, maybe thousands of users, why in the good god damn is it not an obvious decision when we're talking about an instance with *millions* of users?

1 comment
Emme Ci 🍉

@jargoggles @coldfish @aral @Gargron
The fraction of toxic users on Threads is still small.

I believe there are ways to make Threads opt in at the user level, so that your users only have to deal with it if they want to.

That should be the preferred option, unless there is a clear consensus in your instance to fully defederate.

Go Up