Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

@admitsWrongIfProven

No im saying amplifying lies is free advertising for lies, so it causes small lies to snowball into big ones not from the people telling the lies, but from the good people advertising them in a vain attempt to control the narrative, paradoxically allowing the liers to ultimately control the narrative as a result.

What you should do is address the liers at the source, when you hear the lies you call it out to the people lieing and those around. What you dont do is after the fact announce the lies to everyone else, giving those lies exposure and amplifying them.

@LouisIngenthron

7 comments
NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️ replied to 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

@freemo @LouisIngenthron You are right in the arena you set, but i was talking about lies that are in circulation for a long time - completely different thing.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 replied to NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️

@admitsWrongIfProven

The effect is just as relevant after they have been in circulation a long time. Afterall the goal is to reverse those lies and seek a state of truth again no matter how far gone it may be... You only do that by dismissing the lies, not amplifying them, and amplifying the truth to restore sanity.

@LouisIngenthron

NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️ replied to 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

@freemo @LouisIngenthron The difference is if it is established, ignoring it will not make it go away anymore. You need to take action or accept it then.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 replied to NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️

@admitsWrongIfProven

Of course it will still make it go away. I mean when the lies started before the first lie the truth was 100% of the narrative. Despite this the lie being told and amplied caused the truth to "go away" (dwindle to a small minority)... So if lies can replace truth that is well established through these mechanisms why then can not the reverse be true? That once the lies dominate truth, if properly amplified, can cause the lies to go away?

Most processes in life are symmetrical, one thing we particularly struggle to understand in psychological contexts but is equally true.

@LouisIngenthron

@admitsWrongIfProven

Of course it will still make it go away. I mean when the lies started before the first lie the truth was 100% of the narrative. Despite this the lie being told and amplied caused the truth to "go away" (dwindle to a small minority)... So if lies can replace truth that is well established through these mechanisms why then can not the reverse be true? That once the lies dominate truth, if properly amplified, can cause the lies to go away?

NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️ replied to 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

@freemo @LouisIngenthron If what you say was true, there wouls still be a need to establish the counter narrative, thus a need to discuss it.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 replied to NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️

@admitsWrongIfProven

No all you need to do is the exact thing that got the lies established... you scream and yell and talk about the truth, and dont put any attention on the lies... Let the truth be as notable, if not more notable, than the lies... thats all.

@LouisIngenthron

NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️ replied to 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

@freemo @LouisIngenthron If i was able to do that, it would not be a problem - what exactly do you propose to do to make the truth more notable?

Go Up