Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
44 comments
Webwasp

@Miriamm Historically, the term โ€œredโ€ has been used as a broad descriptor for a range of hues, including what we would now distinguish as purple. This categorization stems from a time when languages had fewer words for colors, and โ€œredโ€ was one of the primary color terms used.

Best regards,
Mr Smarty-Pants ๐Ÿ™‚

Michelle Stardust๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ด๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ

@Miriamm we actually call them purple onions here in Colombia, because THEY'RE PURPLE
*Starts a discourse about onions*

Aires

@Miriamm Finally, someone was brave enough to say it!

M.S. Bellows, Jr.

@Miriamm Your "revolution" won't be taken seriously if you keep splitting infinitives like sign guy did.

M.S. Bellows, Jr.

@thedansimonson @Miriamm "[to be] purple." If you're a split-infinitive semi-purist as I am (and yeah, I know most modern grammarians disagree), it should read "clearly are purple."

reviewer 2 :Schwerified:

@msbellows @Miriamm

this is not an infinitive. this is a copular verb. that reading would make every verb an infinitive.

the split infinitive rule was made up by Victorian grammarians in an attempt to make English more Latin-like. it has no actual bearing on actual language.

even so, "purple" is an adjective, so the abolition on split infinitives is irrelevant. "purple" accepts adverbs, the reading here being an indication of where red onions stand on the purple scale.

M.S. Bellows, Jr.

@thedansimonson @Miriamm But "be" is the primary English copular. It's embedded in every infinitive, so daring "it's a cipular verb, not an infinitive" doesn't make sense to me. And the infinitive structure โ€“ "is purple" โ€“ is right there on the sign. The modifier, "clearly," โ€“ again, if you're a semi-purist like me; that's another discussion โ€“ therefore doesn't go between "is" and "onion."

Also, my original tweet was a joke.

potpie

@msbellows @thedansimonson @Miriamm Infinitive... You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

reviewer 2 :Schwerified:

@msbellows @Miriamm "be" is one form of the verb "to be", but it's only an infinitive when a "to" prepends it. An infinitive in English is a verb inflected by "to:" "to buy," "to be," "to speak."

There are plenty of infinitives that have nothing to do with "be," e.g. "I want Steve to buy coffee." "to buy" is an infinitive in that sentence.

"is purple" is not an infinitive structure. "to be purple" would be an infinitive structure.

reviewer 2 :Schwerified:

@msbellows @Miriamm
Well, as a linguist, I have a solemn duty to engage in a kneejerk reaction if the split infinitive rule is brought up, doubly so if there is no infinitive present ๐Ÿ˜‰

EaterOfSnacks

@msbellows @Miriamm That is indeed the infinitive. It is absent from that sign, split or otherwise.

scy

@Miriamm I thought the sign said "People" and I think I need new glasses.

Jim Flanagan

@Miriamm This is what we had to do before social media.

Twobiscuits

@Miriamm Herself asked me what kind of onions I wanted and I said "white ones" and the state of me when she got back with *really* white ones instead of the normal kind ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Dougie

@Miriamm I call red cabbage "purple cabbage" more often than not. ๐Ÿ˜‚

MugsysRapSheet ๐Ÿ”ฉ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜

@Miriamm
"Roses are red,
violets are violet.
They're not blue,
they're violet."

int%rmitt]nt sig^al. ...~!...)

@Miriamm
To me red onions are blue.
I see colours a bare wee bit better than a dog.

plookington

@Miriamm

Don't get me started on my "blueberries are not blue" diatribe . . .

Levy Rat 1969

@Miriamm And baby vegetables aren't really babies.

Go Up