@thegarbagebird @BathysphereHat @castironflower @MaddieT...

Another Angry Woman's posts Post Back to profile

@thegarbagebird @BathysphereHat @castironflower @MaddieT @stavvers
I don't think we're saying they're *not* (I mean, they don't exist yet, but looking past that) - I think we're saying they *can't be*, because maritime law will require them to not be. There may also be technical reasons but the legal (& insurance) reasons would supersede them.

Like 20 March at 0:38 | Wall-to-wall | Open on mastodon.social

4 comments

Mikela replied to FeralRobots

@FeralRobots @thegarbagebird @BathysphereHat @MaddieT @stavvers my understanding is the goal fully automated fleets in international waters and human ran within ports

20 March at 1:19 | Open on hachyderm.io

Mikela replied to Mikela

@FeralRobots @thegarbagebird @BathysphereHat @MaddieT @stavvers looks like i was combining two projects

but it looks like it is legal for robots to drive big ships

20 March at 1:23 | Open on hachyderm.io

binchicken replied to Mikela

@castironflower @FeralRobots @BathysphereHat @MaddieT @stavvers oh good.

20 March at 8:13 | Open on theblower.au

binchicken replied to FeralRobots

@FeralRobots @BathysphereHat @castironflower @MaddieT @stavvers that's what i’d like to think too, but tech companies tend to find things like laws restrictive. they stifle ‘innovation’ and cut into profit margins

20 March at 8:18 | Open on theblower.au

Go Up