If there were a local cooperative host for your email, Mastodon, and file-sharing, would you join?
If there were a local cooperative host for your email, Mastodon, and file-sharing, would you join? 35 comments
@gaba because for lots of people the local is an important locus of identity and dense networks. @ntnsndr Only if it has direct democracy and isn't subject to the excessive committee-ization that certain cooperatives I've seen have been. @ntnsndr @ntnsndr If I wasn't already happy with my setup, absolutely! Naturally, I'd want them to also offer Matrix π @ntnsndr depending on the number of techs involved (as in not a one person shop), yes. @thepoliticalcat @ntnsndr In a sense, that's kind of my situation. This server is run under the umbrella of an incorporated society, of which I'm a financial member. Governance of the server itself is fairly informal, but there are various forums where members gather, where issues relating to it can be raised. @ntnsndr yes but based on confidence in internal governance and (especially for file sharing) technical implementation @ntnsndr Probably not for email unless it was robust and reputational (?) enough to bypass spam filters. Needs to be Fastmail level really. (I use Fastmail and am very happy). @ntnsndr Also, sorry to say, but my experience using Nextcloud has put me off FOSS versions of Gdocs and Dropbox for life. @ntnsndr@social.coop Email and file-sharing, sure, but Mastodon, not so much. It is one of the worst Fediverse platforms, I have no clue why people keep making new instances with it when so many better alternatives exist that are so much cheaper to operate. If someone set up a Fedi instance for Nottingham, I'd be keen to have an account there for planning covid-careful in-person events. That's a project which would really benefit from connections in the same geographical area. @kalebpace yes, me tooβi have suggested it to CU execs and got the impression they had no interest in growing their risk profile @ntnsndr bldrweb is doing alright, I think. Not seeing much member growth, but that's ok. I don't think my local server is big enough to be useful for local-focused discussions. It seems hashtags are better for that. #boulder I think in general, accounts (identities) should not be location specific. People move. People have multiple simultaneous locations/communities. Etc. And they don't want to manage multiple accounts (or inboxes) or try to migrate things when moving locations. @thomasw totally reasonable points. And I think this is one thing I prefer about the composable model of AT Protocol: the layering of relationships, rather than Mastodon's one size fits all. @thomasw @ntnsndr Agreed that tags are the way to go for now. I like frontrange.co and follow #boulder and #cuboulder tags for local info. Maybe we could assemble a list of other local tags to the front range area so that we can all be in the loop better. |
@ntnsndr why local?