Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
26 comments
π˜‹π˜ͺ𝘳𝘬

@Wuzzy Also don't forget to mention that the for-profit organization owning Gitea decided that all non-Gitea copyright headers in all "new" files have to be removed in order for being merged. (We all know what this leads to!)

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/c7dcb58b1d96970959a5c8ac8d3955e4b7d027df/CONTRIBUTING.md#copyright

Lynne
@Wuzzy Meanwhile, at gitlab: "We're making an AI chatbot!"
Nyovella
@Wuzzy Oooh, forgejo sounds like hella based software then, i lvoe
Zergling_man
@Wuzzy I will keep this in mind, if gitea ever causes me too much of a headache I will replace it.
Scott Williams 🐧

@Wuzzy I agree. I maintained a number of Gitea environments for years in production and migrated other systems over to it in enterprise settings. I migrated them all to Forgejo last year without a single regret.

beamchan
@Wuzzy Federation is quite a resource heavy process. That's a big put off for me
owzim

@Wuzzy wut? And here I thought @Codeberg was using gitea under the hood. #til

anafabula

@owzim@mastodon.social @Wuzzy@cyberplace.social @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de They did, until Gitea was taken over by the Gitea Ltd for-profit at the end of 2022. Then Codeberg forked it as Forgejo.
https://blog.codeberg.org/codeberg-launches-forgejo.html

FPS DEV GUY

@owzim @Wuzzy @Codeberg they did use gitea under the hood, but now we all forge instead.

wnm210
@Wuzzy
To be honest, Gitea Cloud isn't a bad idea. It's normal they want money as they kinda have to grow

@april
n0toose

@Wuzzy just reposting so that people can see that I've been sent this 4 times before they do it again xD

Ninmi

@Wuzzy ...what the hell happened to Gitea?

FPS DEV GUY

@Ninmi @Wuzzy this happened

gitea-open-letter.coding.socia

TLDR; some trademark shenanigans by a for profit company that now owned gitea. From then on, their for-profit agenda have made gitea into a gitlab-like "open-core" thingy instead of the open source mission that they should've had since the start.

Honestly, they should've relicensed the whole project as AGPLv3 (or something similar) to avoid anymore closed sourced troubles that might happen in the future.

Yulian Kuncheff

@Wuzzy and neither of them have batch import or mirror from Gitlab or GitHub.

I am not importing 100s of repos 1 by 1.

Andrew Scott

@yulian

While true, doesn't Gitlab have an API you can leverage? It's not like you would literally be forced to click through every single one.

@Wuzzy

Yulian Kuncheff

@ascott @Wuzzy sure, but lately I haven't had a whole lot of time to write scripts to automate it. Work, toddler, newborn, planning move to Europe. It doesn't leave time to write scripts for providers.

Plus I feel like with Forejo Integration could create a button press solution.

It's why I ended up choosing Gitness to do my backups and self-hosted repos. Has batch import. Was done in 2 mins

Angad

@Wuzzy I know you can just replace the Docker image to use Forgejo, but will there be any long-term issues if I migrate that way?

Andre_601 :blobfoxcofe:​

@Wuzzy gitea works on moving the repo to their own instance.

abstractsun

@Wuzzy I tried running the Forgejo web frontend on my local machine and wasn't impressed, most notably because of the high baseline CPU usage. That said, the people at Codeberg do great work.

Dushman

@Wuzzy@cyberplace.social
They do have a web forum so it's not only discord tho

Tassoman
What's wrong with GitLab? πŸ€”
Go Up