@Rjdlandscapes @PacificNic @Strandjunker isn’t the delta between wealth in year 1 and wealth in year 13 equivalent to 12 years of income?
Top-level
@Rjdlandscapes @PacificNic @Strandjunker isn’t the delta between wealth in year 1 and wealth in year 13 equivalent to 12 years of income? 7 comments
@dashrb @PacificNic @Strandjunker They all own about the same (or less) slice of the companies they started. yes this gives them a fair chunk of financial power but its not income its wealth , I'm fine with a wealth tax but I am not fine when your comparing the two @PacificNic @Rjdlandscapes @Strandjunker think there should be both a progressive income tax and a wealth tax. And an inflation adjusted minimum wage. The pendulum swings, and right now it’s way too far to one side. I hope it swings back before society collapses from the inequality. @Rjdlandscapes @dashrb @PacificNic @Strandjunker Why not? If the income of their employees reflected the increase of value they produce, those people wouldn't be able to gain such obscene wealth. @Rjdlandscapes @dashrb @PacificNic @Strandjunker |
@dashrb @Rjdlandscapes @Strandjunker Income over the period plus net change in assets minus expenditures. For the ultra rich, essentially, yes.