|
Top-level
@aral That's why I specifically excluded those. That constitutes I'd guess a tiny fraction of 1% of real world desktop installs. But IBM's Redhat division probably uses 99% code that they did not write, despite their absurd complaints about people using their code for free. The closest you'll come to significant numbers of realworld RHEL users are Fedora users, who pay nothing. In #FreeSoftware, real question is what have I done? Not they, or you, or someone else, but I. Confuses consumers. 2 comments
@aral I wasn't saying it would not be nice to have a good solid native screenreader, but that 'would be nice' isn't magic, it has to be built by people who are either willing to fund it, or do the work. And it may not be possible if it requires certain APIs that are simply not there, which means integrating the work with other projects, which is not easy. I make tools for free as well, but not for the money, it's just to give back, and help fill needs I found in support and sys admin, eg #inxi |
Gregory's Server
@smxi I don’t know, man, I just work on free software all day every day and I don’t have any enterprise customers and neither am I a ~$200B corporation like IBM that profits from Linux because I’m making tools for people not corporations or governments. So maybe, just maybe, folks have a valid reason to ask why something is inaccessible with corporations are making billions with it.
Anyway, have a good day.