Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
McNulla

@thecorodon @inthehands
CEOs are compensated for making wrong decisions too. Maybe we should have AI CEOs?

7 comments
Paul Cantrell

@mcnulla @thecorodon
Honestly their jobs as performed in reality seem a whole lot more suitable for replacement with LLMs than programmers, lawyers, or folks taking support calls

The Corodon

@inthehands @mcnulla
I mean snark aside, AIs seem to show genuine promise in *identifying* patterns rather than *generating* then (e.g. reading mammograms). I assume it could have useful potential as a diagnostic tool in business as well.
But CEOs will have to adapt to this new normal by finding ways to differentiate their offerings from an algorithmic application of MBA principles and oh darn there's that snark again.

Paul Cantrell

@thecorodon @mcnulla
Yeah…unlike, say, blockchain, there really is a “there” there with the current generation of AI. Your detection / generation distinction is a helpful heuristic, as is “Is it OK if the output is kinda bullshit?” But AI in its current state is new, it's going to spending a long time thwarting our intuitions before we get competent at figuring out what it’s good for.

The Corodon

@KeithAmmann @mcnulla @inthehands
If LLMs can make decisions that are only equally bad, the savings would be considerable.
In fact they could make slightly worse decisions and still be a net improvement.

Paul Cantrell

@KeithAmmann @mcnulla @thecorodon
By “jobs as performed,” I meant that training them on the decisions made by human CEOs might at least produce results of similar quality.

M.rauder

@mcnulla @thecorodon @inthehands

How about “Board as a Service”

Have a collection of AI’s for corporate governance to oversee corporations, and set executive CEO pay.

Get them to outsource corporate boards to save money as a good governance function.

It’s a win-win-win!

/s

Go Up