Gregory's Server@DrDanMarshall
I don't know what else to say without repeating myself (which I believe I already have multiple time already). We've been discussing for hours and seemed to have reached an impass hours ago, yet we've continued nonetheless. Let's just agree to disagree on this matter and end the conversation here. (Also, I've appreciated this conversation and your civility)
|
Top-level
2 comments
@Radical_EgoCom Beyond that, I think my central thesis can be boiled down to this: Do you think purely voluntary solidarity between one commune and another could be so strong that a prosperous commune could be convinced to help a fellow commune that has suffered a disaster, not only to some decent minimum of getting back on their feet, but back to economic *equality* with the first one? Or would it require a degree of coercion equivalent to taxation? |
@Radical_EgoCom I have found the clarification of our positions to be helpful. Two spots we couldn't agree was on, essentially, how egoistic humans (and collectives of humans) are, and the related question of how universal nepotism is. Those questions would have to be answered by empirical investigation, so we can't do it here.