@Radical_EgoCom depends. There must not be a monopoly
5 comments
@Radical_EgoCom There is no such thing. If the state runs the companies, you have your monopoly. If you have a problem with the officer of your branch, you're in very bad Karma. There is no difference. What you need is unions and participation. I work for a Hospital that belongs to a local trust. If I have a problem with our management I can look 50 km across the land! Please point me to a country in which you'd say that it worked for the employees. There was Russia, North Korea, China.. chose @dr_jo_mue Russia, China, and North Korea are not examples of Anarcho-Communism. I'm not advocating for the state controlling the means of production, I'm in support of the workers directly owning and managing the means of production without any authoritative structures or hierarchy. @Radical_EgoCom well, and I think unions gave us every benefit we now have. I'd bet on that horse. |
@dr_jo_mue Depends on what? Private ownership of the means of production is the only option that allows for monopoly.