It's capable of doing what ChatGPT does and more, except at a fraction of the cost: $600. They were allowed to do this because Alpaca didn't have to be trained same as GPT was, it only had to learn all of GPT's tricks watching GPT play.
It's capable of doing what ChatGPT does and more, except at a fraction of the cost: $600. They were allowed to do this because Alpaca didn't have to be trained same as GPT was, it only had to learn all of GPT's tricks watching GPT play.
@vruz Ignoring the cult leader that you're quoting, you are witnessing the standard story for a new mechanical improvement to an existing process.
The first few movers must invest quite a bit of money, and then the technique becomes well-known enough that further improvements are croudsourced. In the olden days, this is what patents were meant to ameliorate.
The real insight is that -- like with all software -- eventually the Free Software solution will be preferable, and the profit window will narrow to nothing.
@vruz Ignoring the cult leader that you're quoting, you are witnessing the standard story for a new mechanical improvement to an existing process.
The first few movers must invest quite a bit of money, and then the technique becomes well-known enough that further improvements are croudsourced. In the olden days, this is what patents were meant to ameliorate.
@vruz I also am going to go on a limb here … buy would love to know whether its development was heavily subsidized through the labor of a cadre of underpaid graduate students.
@vruz Ignoring the cult leader that you're quoting, you are witnessing the standard story for a new mechanical improvement to an existing process.
The first few movers must invest quite a bit of money, and then the technique becomes well-known enough that further improvements are croudsourced. In the olden days, this is what patents were meant to ameliorate.
The real insight is that -- like with all software -- eventually the Free Software solution will be preferable, and the profit window will narrow to nothing.
@vruz Ignoring the cult leader that you're quoting, you are witnessing the standard story for a new mechanical improvement to an existing process.
The first few movers must invest quite a bit of money, and then the technique becomes well-known enough that further improvements are croudsourced. In the olden days, this is what patents were meant to ameliorate.
@vruz I also am going to go on a limb here … buy would love to know whether its development was heavily subsidized through the labor of a cadre of underpaid graduate students.
@vruz
@artificialphilosopher
The use of the term "shoggoth" for an LLM is excellent here.