@neauoire
'It is contrary to the spirit of the age,' she asserted.

'Do you mean by that, contrary to the Machine?'

@neauoire great reading, thanks =)

@neauoire I can get behind this vibe

@neauoire Ohohohooo, there is a series of videos of someone repairing it. 🤩
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=UTNs6N7Qyz0

@neauoire reminds me of Andy Warhol demoing the Amiga

@neauoire

Have you considered adding full-line comments to uxnasm?

I saw some forth code in FreeBSD and noticed that backslashes (\) were used as comments (like # in shell or // in C++)

I thought I might just add a simple bash preprocessor to strip out extra comments before the code gets sent to uxnasm.

... when I finally get some time to work on it. XD
Too busy. I need to find a boat or something, lol ;)

@neauoire Very cool!

@neauoire I'll repeat my usual mantra: you're welcome to borrow whatever you want, whenever you need it :) so yes

I'll be moving my boat over there in the next hour or so I think

@neauoire hit em with the gauntlet so you can hear the "HUMILIATION" voice-over

@neauoire damn LPBs! 😄 (wonder how many ppl even know what that is haha)

I wish we could see the milliseconds on report resolve time.

@neauoire Really, it's at some level confusing why a new user should be allowed to use the word "airdrop"

@neauoire its turning into a real cesspool.

@neauoire i couldn't imagine outing myself as that type of loser who runs these scams. cringiest shit i've seen all day.

@neauoire ヽ(⌐■_■)ノ♪♬

My uxntal compiler now passes the type-checker, with 1 unsafe definition. Next challenge, type-checking, the type-checker.. :ouroboros_smile:

@neauoire I just started drinking it every day, for blood pressure help 😂

@neauoire

@neauoire Physician heal thyself

Stumped by this routine pattern :columbo:

@neauoire :: Strongly relate to every word of this. The worst part is that some how the Getter/Setter pattern has leaked into language that qoute-unquote renounce OOP practices.

@neauoire I'm sure that there is some good stuff here but continually reading "this is wrong" turns me right off. There is no objective right and wrong here, any more than there is in a choice of sandwich¹, and I wouldn't want to work with anyone that thought there was.

Also choosing Java to demonstrate the "flaws" of OOP is kind of easy mode — Java is known to get itself tied up in knots.

¹You can't make a milk sandwich, but ham and cheese are not objectively rankable.

@neauoire hmm there is a lot of invalid(or just against the Scandinavian approach of OOP) statement :/

@neauoire this conundrum is what leads many folks down the path of true insanity: writing an inference engine.........

@neauoire what language is this a part of? I thought uxntal had only one type, are you making a new language?

@neauoire I feel this. # type: Comment

@neauoire A classic! Alone the opening statement is gold:

"For those of you concerned with theorems and proofs, I apologize, today is going to be a very bad day."

If you haven't done so yet, also recommend checking out his dissertation: "A foundation for typed concatenative languages"

https://www2.ccs.neu.edu/racket/pubs/dissertation-kleffner.pdf

@neauoire got any conal elliott favourites? never heard of him before

@neauoire Imagine not knowing that simplicity is actually about having a low sum of inverse argmax code size of every phenomena generating world machine plus the indexes of the observer.

@neauoire @winduptoy “intuitive” aka “works like Windows/Mac” :)