It always feels like ancoms are trying to bend Stirnerian egoism to be less nihilistic and more altruistic. Non-domination is just secular humanism rebranded. Are we really nihilistic if we hold equality sacred? Aren't we creating new idols to pray to as a replacement for our old ones which nonetheless reflect them in a different way? It's all just a psyop, secular humanists are infiltrating the Stirnerian circles and I don't like this. I'm no fascist but structural fascism is no better, it's dragging the Stirnerian discourse back.

So there's this phenomenon of "egoist X-ism," the idea that Stirnerian egoism and certain "-isms" are compatible… somehnw. Even though any "-ism" always remains in the world of ideas while you sit here and deny your self-interests based on ideological determination. Aside from meta-anarchism which avoids ideological purity and utopian thinking I'm not sure how egoism can be compatible with any "-ism" whatsoever aside from maybe opportunism. It boggles my mind how certain Stirnerites call themselves "egocoms" or "egomuts" or "egocaps" or "egowhateverthefucks" unironically. It's just baffling to me. At least anarcho-nihilism is more compatible with Stirnerism. Anarcho-nihilists are like: "I don't give a fuck, let's just destroy society." That at least I can understand.