Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
8 posts total
shibco

I need to start keeping a tally of all the projects that fuck up in ways that I warned about four years ago.

Lemmy's dogshit deletion design being the latest to surface: tech.michaelaltfield.net/2024/

shibco

Hello #Berlin friends, does anyone have a #Pantone colour swatch book I could borrow for a few days for a #design project? Know where I could find one? DM me or email cade@newdesigncongress.org
Thank you!

Hallo #Berlin! Ich möchte mir ein #Pantone Farbfächer-Buch für ein #Design-Projekt ausleihen. Wo kann ich eines finden? DM mich oder E-Mail cade@newdesigncongress.org
Vielen Dank!

shibco

In 2020, I published *This is Fine: Optimism & emergency in the p2p network*(newdesigncongress.org/en/pub/t). It laid out a clear argument that the #fediverse is irreparably vulnerable because of its p2p nature and political naivete:

*"Anyone with administrator access to an Instance can read anything that travels through that Instance’s infrastructure – including direct messages. The level of risk correlates with the number of cross-Instance interactions between users. If users from different Instances communicate, an attacker need only compel one Instance to reveal the direct messages between all of the interacting accounts. [...] In a peer-to-peer network without encryption, there’s no structure, no agreed-upon governance, and absolutely no protection. Compromising or compelling an Instance or its staff means that all of network traffic is laid bare to its assailant. [...] The decentralised community seeks to antagonise a powerful status quo whilst making tradeoffs that do not acknowledge how societies directly threaten their communities."*

Today, Kolektiva - a anti-colonial anarchist instance - announced an FBI raid of one of their admins, which included the seizure of an entire copy of the Kolektiva instance.

This is *literally* the kind of situation I warned about nearly three years ago.

kolektiva.social/@admin/110637

In 2020, I published *This is Fine: Optimism & emergency in the p2p network*(newdesigncongress.org/en/pub/t). It laid out a clear argument that the #fediverse is irreparably vulnerable because of its p2p nature and political naivete:

*"Anyone with administrator access to an Instance can read anything that travels through that Instance’s infrastructure – including direct messages. The level of risk correlates with the number of cross-Instance interactions between users. If users...

shibco

At the time, *This is Fine* was shared pretty widely across Mastodon, Secure Scuttlebutt and other related communities. The piece generated a lot of discussion, but ultimately nobody wants to confront this undeniable reality: ActivityPub and all of the platforms that fall under the umbrella of the #fediverse will betray even its staunchest champions of decentralisation or anti-capitalism. The same is true for all other p2p or federated protocols. This digital movement is built on tools whose authors deny the very reality that even they themselves face.

From the forensic immutability of Manyverse/Secure Scuttlebutt, to the backyard-run, un-encrypted, metadata riddled design of every Mastodon/Pleroma/whatever servers, to the utterly insane non-consensual and moderation-free data-storage design of Lemmy, you are all organising on platforms built by people who, quite simply, *have delivered a shockingly dangerous set of tools that will eventually be used against you.*

It beggars belief that any such project could be seen as #queer or #feminist or #anticolonial, because every single server, every single instance is a packaged gift rich with data and ready to inform movements and structures that are out to destroy us.

At the time, *This is Fine* was shared pretty widely across Mastodon, Secure Scuttlebutt and other related communities. The piece generated a lot of discussion, but ultimately nobody wants to confront this undeniable reality: ActivityPub and all of the platforms that fall under the umbrella of the #fediverse will betray even its staunchest champions of decentralisation or anti-capitalism. The same is true for all other p2p or federated protocols. This digital movement is built on tools whose authors...

shibco

European public tech funders brand themselves as feminist yet actively cultivate a culture of precarity that disproportionately affects and excludes anyone with dependents, anyone who can't take financial risk, and anyone with a disability.

If you care for children as a single parent, or live with health issues, it would be supremely irresponsible to depend on the funding model. You either throw the future of you or your dependents into uncertainty, or you are excluded.

slwr

@shibacomputer they opt for the easy feminism rather than the hard feminism…

Powersource

@shibacomputer do you have examples of them calling themselves feminist?

Go Up