Gregory's Server@rayslava Indeed, so please explain how "Google spends money to work on some technical issues in Rust" logically leads to "RIP Carbon".
|
2 comments
|
|
Top-level
@rayslava Indeed, so please explain how "Google spends money to work on some technical issues in Rust" logically leads to "RIP Carbon". 2 comments
|
@simontoth the most promoted feature of Carbon was C++ interoperability but now the company invests into development of the interoperability with Rust, not to Carbon feature development.
I do understand that the company of that scale can go all the ways simultaneously but still the news gives a feeling that Rust was preferred over Carbon 🤷