Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
The Book of Kels

@datarama @thomasfuchs

It doesn't even need to be good at replacing humans.

It needs to be good enough.

3 comments
datarama

@Nezchan @thomasfuchs This is exactly what we see with the image generators.

Their output is often uncanny. They make weird mistakes that no human artist would; mistakes that reveal that they fundamentally don't *understand* anything (eg. all those AI-generated "cozy christmas" motifs a month ago, that featured cookies littering the floors - the model associates cookies with christmas, but doesn't understand that you don't eat them off the floor!).

And they're still displacing visual artists.

The Book of Kels

@datarama @thomasfuchs

Most of the corpos buying into AI don't really care much about the quality. They just want the fantasy of running a business without actually paying employees.

David Marshall

@datarama @Nezchan @thomasfuchs

I've seen "A.I." "art" showing salmon swimming upstream.

Salmon fillets.

Because you eat cookies off the floor while dead salmon swim upstream.

Go Up