@xinmyname It can and will deliver a different answer, if it's trained on biased data on purpose (e.g data that would pretend technocrats and capitalists will solve climate change, only if they make "enough" profit from mass surveillance and planet destruction. Because they're "smarter than anyone else" and and because "innovation" but they "need more money for their research").
The question is: What make anyone believe that there is a different but *still valid** answer.