Will Wikipedia be able to withstand the already ongoing flood of “AI” generated content? “On the internet no one knows you are a dog” is an old joke/meme. But when you think about it by replacing dogs with “AI”, where “AI” means a small oligopoly of commercial entities with an agenda that can afford to burn tons of fossil fuel and water to run their datacenters for the training phase of models — things start to look really frightening. What we need is more H2H (Human to Human) communications.
@jwildeboer Was recently thinking about this. User-generated-content was poor quality for the most part already. AI-generated even crappier. Who reads that stuff? Humans already turning away, so ultimately it’s just AIs writing articles that are used to train other AIs to write articles etc etc etc. Real human interaction/created will be a USP soon.