I am bewildered at how many companies had spent so much to make sure their software was Y2K compliant and at the same time NOT fix the Y2K leap year 'bug'.
So the 29th of February 2000 where I worked back then, some systems were displaying March 1 instead🤦
@tychotithonus @robertatcara
I mean, I totally expected it.
Even back in 1999, most of the people I spoke with were sure the 2000 wasn't going to be a leap year (!!!) and the few that instead knew it was going to be a leap year, they thought it was going to be so because of their wrong reasoning (they only knew the 'every 4 years' part, so they thought the 1900 was a leap year too).