I'm confused - is your reply intended to be a refutation of the general seriousness of mitigated Y2K risks, feedback that I could have picked a more illustrative example, or something else?
My post wasn't intended to be comprehensive. Perhaps you can consider it to be an attempt to help close the gap between the technical understanding and the popular one, to mitigate drift of historical understanding.
@tychotithonus
Not at all. I thought I was offering supporting information. If such was unwelcome, go ahead and mute me, or whatever.