Please don't make this a new trend. 😕
(issue closed by bot because the user filing the issue has not starred the repository...)
daniel:// stenberg://
Please don't make this a new trend. 😕 (issue closed by bot because the user filing the issue has not starred the repository...) 52 comments
Newk
If you like the project please consider to like *here* and share *here* and I would be very happy if you leave a comment.
Skrrp :bisexual_flag:
@bagder I say let it rot. They knew what they were getting into with this behaviour.
James Basoo
@bagder Ew, that's gross. Also auto-closing after a certain time is frustrating. I saw one years old issue recently that people are commenting on every month so it doesn't expire.
daniel:// stenberg://
the hacker news thread about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38691652
Travis Newton :node:
@bagder GitHub has ruined things. This nonsense never happened on Sourceforge or CodePlex. Or on Bugzilla or Mantis instances.
ck
@BrodieOnLinux
Pierre Prinetti
@mattb I’m thinking about an auto-reponder in Slack that filters out messages of non-stargazers
DieMadColonizer
@bagder throw eggs at the devs, put them in trash cans, give them swirlies, bully them till they stop
Thomas Frans 🇺🇦
@bagder How to make me not want to star your project (I literally star every project I find remotely interesting).
Man2Dev :idle:
@bagder when @BrodieOnLinux made the video on how bots closing issues might be problem, I thought isn't he overreacting. I guess I was wrong
Paul Taylor
@bagder Christ. What is even the point. I think at that I would be doing my best to find a replacement.
🔗 David Sommerseth
@bagder This project in question reverted that. And it may even be in violation with GH ToS.
Chris [list of emoji]
Y'know, most of the time when I report a bug, it's as a contribution to the project. The fix itself is rarely useful to me because I've either patched it myself or worked around it.
Gokul Das
@bagder All these started with the 'stale issues' bot. Closing issues automatically based on activity, instead of its merit is a brain-dead concept, IMO. This tendency arises from the social-media-attention-economy where online activity is projected as a status symbol. By promoting the idea that open issues are bad, they're also conditioning people into performing free labor.
🏳️🌈🎃🇧🇷Luana🇧🇷🎃🏳️🌈 :verified:
@bagder that’s worse than those bots that close an issue if you haven’t talked in a week, smh
Hänzi Pōtter
@bagder would they roll back the fix if the user would **un-star** the project later on? asking for a friend 😅
Edvin Malinovskis
@bagder I get the appeal of filtering requests for free work, by some minimal friction. But GitHub starts? Really? 😬 |
@bagder that is just embarassing