Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
20 comments
Alcestuous

@pluralistic No worries. Outta respect, the Russians and Chinese wonโ€™t touch it.

Alternate reply: now we see how Ted Cruz edged out Beto.

Pxtl

@pluralistic I hope all their past clients notice.

C.Suthorn :prn:

@Pxtl @pluralistic

They will not. But if the people who were forced to vote using these machines notice, this people may making them notice in an unpleseant way.

Michael Vilain

@pluralistic What was that Lazarus Long quote again? Oh yes.

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.

Inkican

@pluralistic I forget who said it, but as an infosec expert, they were convinced that no matter how good their methods were - the data was going to be leaked, exposed, or hacked anyway through the incompetence of data custodians.

DELETED

@pluralistic The Bloomberg article says that the access was read-only (bloomberg.com/news/articles/20) They have a mixed factuality rating (ground.news/interest/bloomberg). The fact-checking standards of this link and the only other corroborating link I found are unclear. Read-only access that shows how specific people voted is still an important concern.

Danny Boling ๐ŸŒˆ โ˜ฎ๏ธ

@pluralistic

I've been harping on these machines since Georgia was the first state to roll them out statewide in 2002. Their problems are so obvious!

Kimota94

@pluralistic The Dominion voting machines used in recent U.S. elections have none of those vulnerabilities. Not all digital voting systems are as slapdash as TrueBallot clearly are.

Jeaux

@pluralistic The first clue that jumps out is ONLY 36% of flight attendants voted FOR a 23% pay raise total in an industry that only renegotiates contracts every 5-10 years and rarely offers a few percent raise spread over time if you give up some of your other valuable benefits ๐Ÿ‘€

OddOpinions5

@pluralistic
For elections to political office, actual instances of computer enabled vote fraud appear to be almost non existent,
so this post is almost clickbait

Note:
For decades now, liberals have bee foaming at the mouth about how computerized voting machines are subject to hacking, etc etc
for decades

and yet, as Far as I know, instances of actual real vote fraud in the wild are almost nonexistent; computer enable vote fraud is for the left what voter ID fraud is for the right

@pluralistic
For elections to political office, actual instances of computer enabled vote fraud appear to be almost non existent,
so this post is almost clickbait

Note:
For decades now, liberals have bee foaming at the mouth about how computerized voting machines are subject to hacking, etc etc
for decades

OddOpinions5

@pluralistic
5 gets you 10, the Union official who approved the contract that hired this company, that official got paid off, or his or her gf/bf is sleeping with someone from the company, or something like that

OTOH< never underestimate the ineptness of Union Leaders

bmaxv

@pluralistic Which part of this looks like unintentional incompetence to you?

Jylie

@pluralistic i knew it back before Obama was elected

Nicole Parsons

@pluralistic

With Republicans, accusations are confessions

Go Up