I talk a lot about the incompetence of digital voting vendors a lot, but HOLY CATS
20 comments
They will not. But if the people who were forced to vote using these machines notice, this people may making them notice in an unpleseant way. @pluralistic What was that Lazarus Long quote again? Oh yes. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. @pluralistic that reminds me of this nice piece of humor: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq79wG3DqvI @pluralistic I forget who said it, but as an infosec expert, they were convinced that no matter how good their methods were - the data was going to be leaked, exposed, or hacked anyway through the incompetence of data custodians. @pluralistic The Bloomberg article says that the access was read-only (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/southwest-airlines-flight-attendants-will-hold-new-contract-vote?leadSource=uverify%20wall) They have a mixed factuality rating (https://ground.news/interest/bloomberg). The fact-checking standards of this link and the only other corroborating link I found are unclear. Read-only access that shows how specific people voted is still an important concern. I've been harping on these machines since Georgia was the first state to roll them out statewide in 2002. Their problems are so obvious! @pluralistic The Dominion voting machines used in recent U.S. elections have none of those vulnerabilities. Not all digital voting systems are as slapdash as TrueBallot clearly are. @Kimota94 @pluralistic toss Diebold in the pile with trueballot too @pluralistic The first clue that jumps out is ONLY 36% of flight attendants voted FOR a 23% pay raise total in an industry that only renegotiates contracts every 5-10 years and rarely offers a few percent raise spread over time if you give up some of your other valuable benefits 👀 @pluralistic OTOH< never underestimate the ineptness of Union Leaders |
@pluralistic No worries. Outta respect, the Russians and Chinese won’t touch it.
Alternate reply: now we see how Ted Cruz edged out Beto.