Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Frederic Jacobs

The Gemini video (youtube.com/watch?v=UIZAiXYceB) was indeed deceptive and very heavily edited.

"the voice in the demo was reading out human-made prompts they’d made to Gemini & showing them still images. That’s quite different from what Google seemed to be suggesting: that a person could have a smooth voice conversation with Gemini as it watched and responded in real time to the world around it”

Nevertheless, Gemini appears to be better than GPT-4 at reasoning tasks bloomberg.com/opinion/articles

2 comments
wilander

@fj My understanding is that the version that’s better than ChatGPT 4 is Gemini *Ultra* which has not been released and has no release date. That’s another thing people have been deceived by apparently. I fell for both.

ineiti

@fj Hah, thanks. That explains why I couldn't get google bard to solve my son's matura exams :)

I was really curious on how Gemini works on this. Because ChatGPT-4 is quite astonishing: you drop a PNG of the exam, and it starts solving. With some errors, but you still get the gist on how to solve it.

Google bard couldn't even read the image. And it fails on my "Print a JSON of the planets of the solar system with their size".

But with @wilander 's post I found the following URL. Which states that the current Bard is "Gemini Pro". And the "Gemini Ultra" is coming sometimes next year.

androidauthority.com/gemini-ul

@fj Hah, thanks. That explains why I couldn't get google bard to solve my son's matura exams :)

I was really curious on how Gemini works on this. Because ChatGPT-4 is quite astonishing: you drop a PNG of the exam, and it starts solving. With some errors, but you still get the gist on how to solve it.

Go Up