|
Top-level
 @raulinbonn @q3k @BNetzA @EU_Commission I hope so, because they should not get away with 'we did it to enshure train safety and compliance' excuses. This is just flat-out criminal behaviour! Imagine if MAN were to disable trucks if they did get serviced by fire departments or logistics firms onsite instead of driven to a service center... 6 comments
 @raulinbonn @yacc143 @q3k @BNetzA @EU_Commission And that alone should be considered as #Govware #Backdoor for foreign agents unless evidenced otherwise. Cuz we ain't talking about some "warranty void if removed" kinda sticker thing that would get the owner overcharged the next time they'd seek "authorized" support, but literal attacks of #PublicTransport #infrastructure that could be weaponized to impact #NatSec and #GlobalSec [i.e. blocking train tracks with bricked trains!]... @yacc143 @raulinbonn @q3k @BNetzA @EU_Commission Exactly. This is the kind of shite where @stman wants to scream "I TOLD YA SO!" so loud it could be heard in Poland...  |
Gregory's Server
@kkarhan @raulinbonn @q3k @BNetzA @EU_Commission
They should be treated as terrorists, or at least accomplices.
They basically installed backdoors that could be used by anyone (including terrorists) to trivially sabotage infrastructure.