@zombiecide @evysgarden @scottsantens
I would argue that the main problem of capitalism is "encouraging inequality". Like with "Monopoly", capital is used to bring existing systems out of sync.
Even with a completely local, independent economy (e.g. a village with farmers, craftspeople, bakers, butchers), capital allows you to either expand your business or lower your prices, driving competition into ruin, then have a de-facto monopoly that you can use to raise prices and accumulate more capital.
(This is of course a toy example. Large economies work... worse?)
In my opinion, exhausting resources is simply an easy way to maximize profit. Which is why I think that using any kind of non-renewable, non-recyclable resource should be too expensive for any company.
In that regard, bitcoin is actually a pure form of capitalism: Burning resources to create meaningless numbers.
@wakame Yeah, I condensed it a bit. Like, if you exchange access to resources for labour, and the resources are limited but labour is basically renewed overnight, and you want the capital to mostly remain in the hands of who has it already (for power/system stability), then today's labour has to be worth less than yesterday's, and preferrably you'd want to increase the amount of resources whereever possible ('reserves'), usually making renewables into non-renewables via exploitation.