Gregory's Server@boud @santiagofn @afranke You are welcome to package the program however you see fit but quit soliciting developers into taking on a bigger work load.
|
2 comments
 I wasn't requesting developers to take on a bigger workload. I commented on the problems with Flatpak, and responded to your comment on Flatpak; short-term easiness is not the same long-term sustainability. A temporary workaround is often a useful step towards a long-term sustainable software package: it's a proof of concept. Fractal 5 does sound like a good achievement :). If people like it, they can work on the dependencies and eventually the package itself. |
@Myles124
Not quite right. The team would really rather not have downstreams. Technically free to, but pretty please don’t.