Gregory's Server@roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th oh yeah, they weren't going to get caught in the act, for sure. But I'm skeptical about the van... tough to get line of sight to the top of the Hancock Building from a van unless you're WAY far out... I grew up at 87th Street and California and I don't even think a van could do it from there. I think they were likely close by and high up in one of the nearby buildings.
|
7 comments
@roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th maybe you could do it from the lakefront. That's likely possible. So maybe it was a van  @AE4WX @flockofnazguls @th I'd only ever heard the "van" thing as a rumor, and I only bought into that because (1) if I were to run a hijack, mobility would be on my mind (2) Tampa FL had a famous FM pirate station that operated from a van. @AE4WX @flockofnazguls @th Ah, I didn't realize the receiver for the signal from the studio was on top of the Hancock. I know Chicago geography, but hadn't thought about where the TV transmitters were. I come from rural Florida, where getting line-of-sight to a tower was never very hard. @roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th So what happened was, back in those analog days, WGN and WTTW transmitted a link to their main transmitters on top of the Hancock Building and Sears Tower (I forget which was which). The hijacker basically sent a stronger signal than the station link, and because of FM capture, voilà- the hijackers signal wins. @roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th the problem with a van in downtown Chicago is all the buildings block line of sight. @roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th I should add- it hasn't been possible to do this again for years. |
@roadriverrail @flockofnazguls @th From where I lived you could see (and therefore transmit to) the skyline only if you climbed a tall tree.
Closer in, I used to work at Archer and Lawndale, and on the top of the parking garage you could get line of sight from there... not sure where you could get a van that high though.