@knwmoon I don't think it is. X Corp is a California company. I don't know how Muck can assert standing to sue MMFA in TX when X Corp is California based and MMFA is DC based. @parismarx
Top-level
@knwmoon I don't think it is. X Corp is a California company. I don't know how Muck can assert standing to sue MMFA in TX when X Corp is California based and MMFA is DC based. @parismarx 5 comments
@dmaonR Muck is suing MMFA in TX. Paxton is alleging fraud occurred in TX. Not sure how that standing exists when the company allegedly defrauded is in California and the defendant is located in DC. @knwmoon @parismarx @dmaonR @weezmgk @knwmoon @parismarx |
@weezmgk @knwmoon @parismarx
Xitter is not filing suit. It is the TX AG Paxton doing a favour for one of his favourite donors. It is a win-win for the AG. He helps his buddy and wins points from his rabid base.