@starfrost @bitsavers Personally, I'm impressed that it can generate something that looks so convincingly like plausible text, without processing any notion of text beyond mere appearance. It's already outdoing 18th and 19th century Europeans writing faux-Chinese decorative texts. Those "experts" were far less capable than this.
For instance, look at this 21st century remembering of 18th century English garbage: https://gorgeouswithattitude.blogspot.com/2010/09/chinoiserie-pavilion-hamilton-gardens.html
@libroraptor @bitsavers
It's because of the size of the training data, I would say. If you train something on the entire internet it will "effectively" recognise text.
My main bugbear with people calling LLMs useless is that, even though they kinda are in a lot of ways, they had a lot of the same social effect as real AI would.
Also that is actually fucking hilarious. Of course it's british.