Gregory's Server
@walter4096 @paulschoe it's not breaching IP if they already own the training data.
The questions about stolen surplus are legitimate, if humans are subject to copy laws, then why shouldn't machines?
|
2 comments
there's more at stake than entertainment. the world is in trouble, we have big problems we're not solving fast enough with our own minds. These image generators are evidence of visual intelligence, which would be available as part of other problem solving processes check this out https://twitter.com/svlevine/status/1714307592875647291 SD 'image edits' used to help robot motion planning given a goal (imagine intermediate steps) |
@i0null @paulschoe
this is where its ambiguous IMO,
we all carry traces of what we've all seen in our heads.
e.g. I can draw x-wing fighters, darth vader etc from memory.
but I can't sell those.
same with AI art. you can't sell images of IP
some rulings have been made like this
I think there's a compromise to be found that lets us all benefit from this new capability (ability to copy *generative rules* vs finished works)