Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
3 comments
jaf
@BrodieOnLinux as someone who was cursed by having some rando making an aur package for something i was actively developing at work just for it to bitrot and shit up the issue tracker for over 2 years from clueless script kiddies on arch linux saying my software is broken please fix it with no ability to be able to, i will say this:
first, FUCK ARCHLINUX.
second, ONLY send bugs to the package maintainer.
@BrodieOnLinux as someone who was cursed by having some rando making an aur package for something i was actively developing at work just for it to bitrot and shit up the issue tracker for over 2 years from clueless script kiddies on arch linux saying my software is broken please fix it with no ability to be able to, i will say this:
Random Tux User :fedora:

@BrodieOnLinux
In this case I think Fedora reserves the right to package bottle. I mean it's FOSS. That said, I think that Fedora should redirect all support links to itself rather than bottles. I'm pretty sure some other distributions already do this and I'm surprised Fedora doesn't.

I'm all in favour for bottles to force this. They should not have to deal with supported requests for things that they did not package themselves.

Go Up