Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Molly White

If I scribble out a lopsided drawing of my dog and try to sell it on Etsy or at a booth in an art convention, I probably won't find any takers. Most people probably won't take that to mean that the fine art market is in freefall, but that's kind of what happened here.

Much like with sketches or paintings, pretty much anyone can create an NFT. If you’ve got a pencil or some paints, you can make art; if you have an Internet connection, you can make an NFT.

Much like with sketches or paintings, most NFTs aren’t very good.

Much like with sketches or paintings, most NFTs don’t sell.

If I scribble out a lopsided drawing of my dog and try to sell it on Etsy or at a booth in an art convention, I probably won’t find any takers. Most people probably won’t take that to mean that the fine art market is in freefall.

But that’s kind of what happened here.
A quickly sketched drawing of a pink dog with tall pointy ears, a blue collar with a heart shaped tag, and "MW 2023" signed in the corner.

Caption reads: "No one bought any of the 19 crayon drawings I made of my dog. 95% of art is worthless!"
14 comments
Molly White

Worst of all: in their quest to reprint a click-grabbing, doom-and-gloom number, these media outlets also ended up printing a bunch of crypto casino reviewers' optimistic predictions for the future of NFTs.

Now, I am already the kind of person who gets annoyed when media outlets reprint bunk studies, even when they are supporting conclusions that are themselves at least vaguely accurate. Others might tell me to chill out, and to spend my time worrying about all the bad data out there being used to support blatant falsehoods.

However, what annoys me in particular about this report being laundered into the mainstream news cycle is that Rolling Stone and The Guardian — in their evidently neverending quest to both-sides any issue placed in front of them — are also printing the authors’ optimistic predictions for the NFT industry. A bunch of crypto casino reviewers promoting the rosy future of NFTs probably wouldn’t have made it into multiple mainstream media outlets had it not been for the fact that it was included alongside the eye-catching, but misleading, 95% figure.
Phil Rees

@molly0xfff Why draw attention to it instead of pointing to more legitimate sources that describe the negatives of NFTs?

E.g.

sciencedirect.com/science/arti

Jon Renaut

@molly0xfff COUNTERPOINT: your dog is a very good dog

Dark Table

@molly0xfff You there! Name your price for the crayon on paper depiction of your dog!

Karl Higley

@molly0xfff Agree with your points here, and also: I would genuinely buy a print of that drawing if such a thing were available on Etsy or wherever. It looks just like our dog!!

Brian Reiter

@molly0xfff except if you were only selling a receipt for the thing that everyone can download for free in a made-up currency.

chx

@molly0xfff why are you so sure that drawing wouldn't sell on Etsy? :)

ᴚ uɐᗡ

@molly0xfff

pffft your dog doesn't even have a tiny cigarette what did you expect

ᴚ uɐᗡ

@molly0xfff FTFY just wait until you post this on UPDOGG

image of dog - but very pixelated

will be huge
Mathaetaes

@molly0xfff tbf, that’s actually a pretty damn good drawing of of a dog.

Go Up