@mattb @cmsj @ariadne @eff We are already well down that path: refusing service to LGBT+ is protected, as evidenced by multiple SCOTUS rulings. As is refusing service for partisan membership or political beliefs.

In that context, the argument here is that violently hateful anti-LGBT+ speech is uniquely privileged.

The decision has already been made about who should not be protected: the people KF is dedicated to terrorizing.