@J12t opinion piece in the NYT not an article in a science magazine. Citing philosophers in a physics article seems strange
"But the model has already been patched up numerous times over the past half century to better conform with the best available data"
Yup, scientific theory adjusts to fit data rather than data adjusting to fit theory
The 4th Doctor said something about views fitting facts, not the other way around :)
https://mastodon.social/@guide@tardis.team/110990776108357241
@lufthans imho most interesting questions — to me at least — posed by either very large-scale or very small-scale physics border, or often cross over into philosophy. Start with the Copenhagen interpretation and continue to the simulation hypothesis … of course not everybody might be interested in those.