|
Top-level
@BrentToderian This is 2/3 of the way to being a great graphic. But it falls apart on that last 1/3 by using the debunked "95% of crashes (#CrashNotAccident) are caused by human error" figure. Debunked because crashes arise from a wide range of interdependent factors, including but extending well beyond the actions of any single human. They really should have just made it a 2-panel graphic. 10 comments
 @shoo @DrTCombs @BrentToderian All things are random if you have insufficient insight into their causes. @wizzwizz4 @DrTCombs @BrentToderian Maybe, but last time checking the weather forecast on 4 different sites before going for 30 minute walk ended up in me getting soaked even tho the probability of rain was 20% :D sufficient insight = time... I'd rather luck it out then. It's fun Speed and weight are a function of the cars design and that is a big factor in crashes. @Havant_Enviro @BrentToderian speed, weight, height, power, cognitive load, road design, roadside management, land use patterns, traffic conditions, traffic composition, signalization schemes, presence or absence of alternatives to driving, social norms and expectations... @DrTCombs @BrentToderian human error seems to always happen on streets & intersections designed the same ways, how weird. |
Gregory's Server
@DrTCombs @BrentToderian Wide range of interdependent factors sounds like randomness