@jackwilliambell @Edwin085 It's the ground cover more than the trees tbh. At the end, it's lush, much more so than anywhere I've been in Iceland
Top-level
@jackwilliambell @Edwin085 It's the ground cover more than the trees tbh. At the end, it's lush, much more so than anywhere I've been in Iceland 1 comment
|
@bellinghman @Edwin085
I'll admit 'lush' is not a word that applies to most of Iceland. There are a few spots with a lot of vegetation, but 'few' is the operative word. Most of the place barely has enough vegetation to support the omnipresent sheep.
So, I'll concede the point. It *could be* Iceland, but it's *not at all likely to be* Iceland.