Gregory's Server
My conclusions here are basically:
1. What nivenly has as a stated goal is a member-driven co-op where individuals can and do drive change. In that model, it isn't what "nivenly does" it is what "we do," together. I'm of the view that this is admirable
2. HOWEVER they don't seem to know what they are doing in order to enable that and are hitting a lot of what I'd call "unforced errors" along the way
3. Some of those unforced errors are things I'd view as existential threats
@mnl
4. The problem I am seeing is if there is sufficient dissonance between an individual's ability to drive change and the rhetoric, it is going to be a Problem™ and one I have very little patience for, and fixing that is more work than I am signing up for right now (it requires access to a member list and a lot of time).
So it comes out to the same basic conclusion—this is a litmus test—but I think I've gotten there via a different route.
@aburka