Gregory's Server@zandbelt
Google is still great in my opinion, regardless it makes mistakes
@rodhilton
|
6 comments
 @ErikJonker @zandbelt @rodhilton If you have enough knowledge to check the result, fine. But (a) people are lazy (proofs already exist of people who know but didn't check); and (b) what about the people who don't know any better? And when these systems start eating their own garbage it will just escalate into utter insanity. @adaddinsane @zandbelt @rodhilton ...the assumption is I think (which might be correct) that these tools will get better, ofcourse mistakes will remain but that's also possible with traditional search @ErikJonker @zandbelt @rodhilton @whole1day @zandbelt @rodhilton well perplexity annotates results with footnotes which are very often scientific papers @ErikJonker @rodhilton more or less the same that applies to ChatGPT, luckily you are still required to think and judge for yourself on top what is generated and presented faster then you can manage (but it is also a bit scary when you start thinking whether others will judge the results with care or just take things for granted...am I to cynical here? or in other person's view the guy that feels he is the genius and elite while others are just "stupid" idiots? Hope not...it IS quite scary?!) |
@zandbelt @rodhilton ... I like perplexity.ai , in addition to Google, yes it's an LLM and can't be trusted, you have to check results, but it provides sources to make that easier