@timthelion @bk1e The whole point of the service is opt-in zero-configuration avatars for services and apps. Note that these are non-reversible hashes of email addresses you’re talking about, not state secrets. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Top-level
@timthelion @bk1e The whole point of the service is opt-in zero-configuration avatars for services and apps. Note that these are non-reversible hashes of email addresses you’re talking about, not state secrets. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 1 comment
|
@thomasfuchs @timthelion I’m not saying Gravatar is bad. I think using Gravatar as an example helps explain part of the Moq thing. The hash is not directly reversible, but if you add emails, hashed emails, and other user-correlated data (like avatars or open source sponsorship info) to a database, you can look up the other data by hashed email.