"I’m still perplexed at what the complaint is here? You don’t need to “consent” for someone to analyze your book. You don’t need to “consent” to someone putting up statistics about their analysis of your book.
But, Zach’s tweet went viral with a bunch of folks ready to blow up anything that smacks of tech bro AI, and lots of authors started yelling at Smith."
I think that anything adjacent to "tech bro harm" is going to be treated as a hostile product. There will be lots of collateral damage.
@abraxas3d The problem is that the full text is exploited by third parties without authorization. It's not just a right of quotation. The fact that the stuff has not generated income *yet* is not a sufficient reason to allow it.