Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Dr. Quadragon ❌

I mean, the Internet has always been a product of some kind of Nash equilibrium. It has been since its inception as a part of the nuclear project - when maintaining atomic warfare parity between states was crucial.

Since the Internet opened up, it has been revolving around parity between the states, corporations and general public.

We don't necessarily *like* each other, in fact, all three sides hate each others' guts. But, without clear path to victory over another, for each of our own sakes, the Internet must exist, neutrally and equitably.

I think, that equilibrium is slowly eroding, and us comon folk are basically stuck between a hammer and a hard place here.

The only hope I see here, is that it's ultimately us who build this network. All the other parties just claim ownership of what we've built. Talk about labour alienation. It's all they can.

2 comments
Dr. Quadragon ❌

So we, theoretically, can tell them to fuck right off and claim actual ownership of our communication systems.

But it will require getting pissed off. And potentially getting shot at. A lot.

Because one side has people with guns. And the other side has money. Which means also people with guns. And pretty much all we have is numbers and the know-how.

I'm not sure if we got spirit for that. :(

Dr. Quadragon ❌

I know that old adage that the Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. For now, it still holds true.

But how much more damage can we sustain before we can't route around it any more?

Go Up