Gregory's Server@blacklight Well said! There was an engineering elegance back then - excruciating detail simply implemented in ways that minimized potential catastrophic points of failure.
<siiiiigh>
|
Top-level
 @blacklight Well said! There was an engineering elegance back then - excruciating detail simply implemented in ways that minimized potential catastrophic points of failure. <siiiiigh> 1 comment
|
@rickf @blacklight I assure you this was project specific. 70% of software development projects failed entirely. Of the ones that succeeded, there may not have been much bloat (no room for it), there was still lots of code that shipped with [cough] unplanned features.