Gregory's Server@kissane okay I read the methodology section, and yeah my fundamental problem with their methodology still stands. They just took a list of the top 25 servers by population and scanned them for CSAM content, but that doesn't take into account the fact that that's not really representative of what people actually joining the network will be able to see or the network as a whole, because the top 25 servers could include bad servers by dint of bots or there just being lots of bad people, and they could be completely defederated from the rest of the network, but it would still show up as that bad stuff supposedly being "on the network," so I don't think it's really representative of the actual network itself or experience of using it or danger to people on it.
@anarchopunk_girl I…don’t think it’s perfect, but I also think it’s more usefully considered as a free diagnostics pass and recs set from the pros than as an unfair gotcha. Any CSAM is too much, obviously, so patching holes seems to me like an important priority for admins and devs.